are cryptocurrencies See results about

The volume of transactions has come up, and this volume can be a little familiar. I remember that the first two days of the last wave were like this. The volume can rise suddenly, but the performance of individual stocks is average, and the next day is still average, but after two but three, the third day begins to pull straight lines. However, we should pay attention to the problem that the main funds of the market are still flowing out, and it is an uninterrupted outflow. Who can explain this problem? Anyway, I can't explain it. Theoretically, it is right to enter it on a large scale, but why is it still negative? I don't believe that retail investors are fleeing, but if institutions are fleeing, what is the mystery? Is it that institutions are still not optimistic about the general trend? Under such a big policy, institutions still think that the stock market is unreliable! I don't believe this either. ......The conference on traditional Chinese medicine is still going on. We can only hope that the big news after the market will be overweight and help it tomorrow. Otherwise, there is no suspense about the consequences. Let's go back and have a look at the previous time when stamp duty was halved. It is estimated that it is the same.The conference on traditional Chinese medicine is still going on. We can only hope that the big news after the market will be overweight and help it tomorrow. Otherwise, there is no suspense about the consequences. Let's go back and have a look at the previous time when stamp duty was halved. It is estimated that it is the same.

In terms of sectors, it was never expected that the brokers didn't move today. The flag bearer didn't move, and there was only one ticket in the session, and there were almost no other tickets over five points. This is not normal. This is suppressed by the window. It is a prerequisite to slow down the cattle and not to be fast. Compared with internet finance, it is more beautiful than brokers, and there are several daily limit in the front row. It seems that if it really works, internet finance has more hope to replace the standard bearer.The conference on traditional Chinese medicine is still going on. We can only hope that the big news after the market will be overweight and help it tomorrow. Otherwise, there is no suspense about the consequences. Let's go back and have a look at the previous time when stamp duty was halved. It is estimated that it is the same.The volume of transactions has come up, and this volume can be a little familiar. I remember that the first two days of the last wave were like this. The volume can rise suddenly, but the performance of individual stocks is average, and the next day is still average, but after two but three, the third day begins to pull straight lines. However, we should pay attention to the problem that the main funds of the market are still flowing out, and it is an uninterrupted outflow. Who can explain this problem? Anyway, I can't explain it. Theoretically, it is right to enter it on a large scale, but why is it still negative? I don't believe that retail investors are fleeing, but if institutions are fleeing, what is the mystery? Is it that institutions are still not optimistic about the general trend? Under such a big policy, institutions still think that the stock market is unreliable! I don't believe this either. ......

The volume of transactions has come up, and this volume can be a little familiar. I remember that the first two days of the last wave were like this. The volume can rise suddenly, but the performance of individual stocks is average, and the next day is still average, but after two but three, the third day begins to pull straight lines. However, we should pay attention to the problem that the main funds of the market are still flowing out, and it is an uninterrupted outflow. Who can explain this problem? Anyway, I can't explain it. Theoretically, it is right to enter it on a large scale, but why is it still negative? I don't believe that retail investors are fleeing, but if institutions are fleeing, what is the mystery? Is it that institutions are still not optimistic about the general trend? Under such a big policy, institutions still think that the stock market is unreliable! I don't believe this either. ......In terms of sectors, it was never expected that the brokers didn't move today. The flag bearer didn't move, and there was only one ticket in the session, and there were almost no other tickets over five points. This is not normal. This is suppressed by the window. It is a prerequisite to slow down the cattle and not to be fast. Compared with internet finance, it is more beautiful than brokers, and there are several daily limit in the front row. It seems that if it really works, internet finance has more hope to replace the standard bearer.The volume of transactions has come up, and this volume can be a little familiar. I remember that the first two days of the last wave were like this. The volume can rise suddenly, but the performance of individual stocks is average, and the next day is still average, but after two but three, the third day begins to pull straight lines. However, we should pay attention to the problem that the main funds of the market are still flowing out, and it is an uninterrupted outflow. Who can explain this problem? Anyway, I can't explain it. Theoretically, it is right to enter it on a large scale, but why is it still negative? I don't believe that retail investors are fleeing, but if institutions are fleeing, what is the mystery? Is it that institutions are still not optimistic about the general trend? Under such a big policy, institutions still think that the stock market is unreliable! I don't believe this either. ......